Rewards are ALWAYS proportional to the risks…
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Rewards are rarely directly proportional to any one thing. It is always a combination.
Talking about rewards being ALWAYS proportional to risks, I will let these pictures speak 
1. High Risk…
2. Higher Risk…
Very interestin point Rajesh,
I would be very interested of your more-in-depth view of this and of the combination of factors. If you’d like to share it. Just today I had a phonecall from a potential partner using “The higher risk…” phrase. Made me thinking…
thanks for your answer
Viktor,
Best,
Thank you for your note. Please send me a note offline on this topic. I don’t want to start a thread on this topic as it is more complicated to be a blog post
Raj
This post made me smile.
Was his reward that he got to work on a window office? Or was it that the higher risk version allowed him to wash many floors’ worth of windows at once?
very well put
In the context of the pictures, don’t the risks plateau after a while? After all, how much less riskier is the 50th floor compared to the 100th floor? The rewards in this case seem to be iin fact independent of the risk. After all he can only clean one window at a time.
Hi Suresh,
Sorry. I was being a bit sarcastic there. In both cases, the rewards are nothing compared to the risk that these people are taking.
Whether the person is cleaning the windows at floor no. 50 or floor no. 100 or for that matter floor no.10, he is losing. The rewards are not proportional to the risks.
I was trying to make the contrarian point here.
My $.02 of course.
Best,
Raj
Window washing is a low skilled job. Your picture is a classic example of elevating a low skilled job to a highly skilled job. Risk becomes a barrier for entry to others.
Hi RaviC,
No Offence, but please respect each and every job.
Thanks,
Praveen