<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another interesting perspective on Social Networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifebeyondcode.com/2005/06/16/another-interesting-perspective-on-social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifebeyondcode.com/2005/06/16/another-interesting-perspective-on-social-networking/</link>
	<description>Personal and professional development for technology professionals.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1-alpha-10188</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lifebeyondcode.com/2005/06/16/another-interesting-perspective-on-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.lifebeyondcode.com/2005/06/16/another-interesting-perspective-on-social-networking/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I agree, apart from a few technological points that we have to keep in mind, online networking is not different from traditional networking - the basic principle of building a relationship always remains. I think that's where most people mess up - as you rightly said - they feel that because it's easy to get connected and reach into someone's inbox, it must be easy to build a relationship. But it needs effort - and more sensitivity than a face-to-face meeting.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, apart from a few technological points that we have to keep in mind, online networking is not different from traditional networking - the basic principle of building a relationship always remains. I think that&#8217;s where most people mess up - as you rightly said - they feel that because it&#8217;s easy to get connected and reach into someone&#8217;s inbox, it must be easy to build a relationship. But it needs effort - and more sensitivity than a face-to-face meeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lifebeyondcode.com/2005/06/16/another-interesting-perspective-on-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.lifebeyondcode.com/2005/06/16/another-interesting-perspective-on-social-networking/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Thanks Naina.
For the record, I don't have anything against LinkedIn. In fact, I have a good friend working for them. My point was that online or offline, the principles of networking will remain the same - you have to have a healthy value exchange else the relationship won't last long. If you are not relevant to another person, the person may not have a lot of interest in you.
For some reason, many people tend to believe that because it's easy to get connected online, it's easy to build a lasting relationship. Getting connected is only the first step - that won't provide a short cut to building a lasting relationship.
Have a great day there!


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Naina.<br />
For the record, I don&#8217;t have anything against LinkedIn. In fact, I have a good friend working for them. My point was that online or offline, the principles of networking will remain the same - you have to have a healthy value exchange else the relationship won&#8217;t last long. If you are not relevant to another person, the person may not have a lot of interest in you.<br />
For some reason, many people tend to believe that because it&#8217;s easy to get connected online, it&#8217;s easy to build a lasting relationship. Getting connected is only the first step - that won&#8217;t provide a short cut to building a lasting relationship.<br />
Have a great day there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lifebeyondcode.com/2005/06/16/another-interesting-perspective-on-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.lifebeyondcode.com/2005/06/16/another-interesting-perspective-on-social-networking/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I agree hands-down that networking is "give and take". But I can't get enough of saying that we have to differentiate between "business" and "social" networking. I completely disagree with David's post on Worthwhile [have left a comment there too] - I doesn't seem like any research had gone into writing that article.
Naina biznetworking.blogspot.com

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree hands-down that networking is &#8220;give and take&#8221;. But I can&#8217;t get enough of saying that we have to differentiate between &#8220;business&#8221; and &#8220;social&#8221; networking. I completely disagree with David&#8217;s post on Worthwhile [have left a comment there too] - I doesn&#8217;t seem like any research had gone into writing that article.<br />
Naina biznetworking.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
